Looking for fresh ideas to promote your TTO? This column, the TTO Toolkit, is here to help! Each installment features AUTM Members sharing real-world strategies, creative approaches, and hard-earned lessons to help you elevate your office’s visibility and impact. Learn from your peers and get inspired to try something new!
Bridging the Gap Between Discovery and Patenting: West Virginia University’s Proof-to-Patent Pilot Program

Christopher P. Menchini, PhD
Director of Intellectual Property and Commercialization
Office of Innovation and Commercialization
West Virginia University
In university technology transfer, promising ideas sometimes stall in the gap between early discovery and a patent-ready invention. Without experimental validation, it can be difficult to demonstrate the technical feasibility or commercial potential needed to move an innovation forward.
At West Virginia University (WVU), the Office of Innovation and Commercialization (OIC) developed the Proof-to-Patent Pilot Program (P2P) to address this challenge. The program provides small, targeted funding to help researchers generate the validation data needed to strengthen patent applications and support commercialization efforts.
Many of the technologies that benefit most from early validation are hypothesis-driven concepts in life sciences and materials sciences, as well as inventions focused on industrial process improvements. In these cases, experimental data demonstrating performance gains or material properties can significantly strengthen both patent filings and industry engagement. Validation data not only helps enable a stronger patent application, it also helps pique the interest of potential licensees and convince them of the technology’s value.
From a patent perspective, the absence of early experimental data can manifest into narrower, more conservative claims and greater vulnerability to written description and enablement challenges, especially in crowded or fast-moving fields.
The structure of the program is intentionally simple. Once an invention disclosure is on file, OIC works with the inventor to identify one or two “make-or-break” critical technical questions that could determine whether the invention is patentable or commercially viable. In many cases, the validation work involves adding additional runs, samples, or confirmatory assays within existing workflows rather than launching entirely new research lines.
Researchers can then apply for up to $1,000 to conduct targeted experiments using WVU’s internal research infrastructure, such as Shared Research Facilities, Health Sciences Center Core Facilities, the WISER Analytical Lab, or the Lane Innovation Hub.
A key goal of P2P is to maximize the university’s existing investments in research infrastructure. Rather than creating new facilities or programs, the funding is directed through established cores and laboratories, increasing their use while keeping the program efficient and cost-effective.
Although still relatively new, the program is already improving patent application quality. Data that was previously unavailable can help outside counsel draft broader and more confident independent claims supported by concrete examples rather than purely prophetic ones. Even when claim scope does not necessarily expand, clearer evidence around a technology’s mechanism or performance can reduce back-and-forth during application drafting and strengthen the overall portfolio.
The impact is also visible in conversations with potential industry partners. When patent claims are supported by data generated through recognized institutional cores, companies can move quickly past basic feasibility questions and focus instead on pipeline fit, regulatory considerations, and go-to-market strategies. Even a single, well-designed validation experiment can shift conversations from exploratory to serious diligence, sample testing, or collaborative grant planning.
The program also helps OIC make better portfolio decisions. If P2P experiments fail to support a key claim, the office can redirect resources before investing in more costly national or international patent filings.
Beyond patents and licensing, P2P has also strengthened engagement with faculty inventors. Because the program is straightforward and closely aligned with researchers’ goals, it often serves as an easy entry point for faculty who may not have previously worked closely with the technology transfer office. P2P signals that the institution is willing to explicitly invest in helping faculty bridge the gap between research and impact.
P2P has also given OIC staff more insight into the specific costs and timelines associated with service requests and the translated value that a resulting work product provides. Staff values the program’s ability to serve as a conversation starter. Even when inventors ultimately decide not to submit a full invention disclosure due to very early‑stage conception, the process of discussing what data would have been needed often informs their next project.
Ultimately, success for the program is measured across several dimensions. At the project level, OIC evaluates whether the funded work strengthens the patent position, advances industry discussions, or delivers a clear go-or-no-go decision that saves downstream resources. At the portfolio level, success may include a higher share of provisional applications that merit conversion, faster progress toward licenses or sponsored research, and stronger collaboration between inventors and institutional core facilities.
For technology transfer offices considering a similar initiative, WVU offers practical advice: keep the structure simple and position the program as a way to de-risk existing institutional investments; $1,000 today can protect or enhance a much larger future spend on research and patent prosecution. Require a disclosure on file, focus on a few clear validation questions, and route funds through internal cores. Set expectations that not every project will “win”; a data‑driven decision not to file or convert can still be a portfolio success. Finally, highlight the educational and cultural upside, as the program nudges faculty to design experiments with commercialization in mind, which may be its most valuable long‑term impact.
By providing targeted resources at a critical early stage, WVU’s Proof-to-Patent Pilot Program is helping promising discoveries move more efficiently from the lab toward real-world impact.